Noticing a huge difference between the R710 and R600/700 for distant 5GHz clients

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 2 years ago
As a part of troubleshooting my lost heartbeats issue, I swapped the locations of my R600 and R710 to rule out the underlying wired network. But at any rate, this leaves my R710 in my office and my R600 in the geometric center of my place.

I did a test for fun, connecting to the R710 from a 1-stream AC smartphone on 5GHz from the opposite edge of my place, through 4 walls and a washer/dryer stack. To my surprise, I can still get 100mbit of download and ~50mbit of upload, when before with the R600 it would barely be able to hold a connection, and simply setting the phone down on a table would cause it to lose almost all upload connectivity.

If I were building a network from scratch today (and cost wasn't a factor), after this test I would choose R710's hands-down. Even though it would seem on paper that the R710 wouldn't benefit non-wave2 clients, it seems like in practice it delivers superior performance to even legacy clients!
Photo of John D

John D, AlphaDog

  • 497 Posts
  • 136 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Jim Michael

Jim Michael

  • 37 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
The specs tell much of the story... 512 antenna patterns in a R600 vs 3000 in a R710. ;-) Lots more ways to beamform with the higher-end APs.