Hi all,
I have got a R600 unleashed and a intel 9560 card, both should do 1300mbs at 5ghz accoording to the specs.. But I am stuck at 866mbs in windows. In real life I get 500mbs and that is great but looks it could go faster but how or with what settings?
thx
Jeroen
I have got a R600 unleashed and a intel 9560 card, both should do 1300mbs at 5ghz accoording to the specs.. But I am stuck at 866mbs in windows. In real life I get 500mbs and that is great but looks it could go faster but how or with what settings?
thx
Jeroen
- 4 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
Posted 1 year ago
Michael Brado, Official Rep
- 3073 Posts
- 442 Reply Likes
Perfect vacuum, within 10'...? Real life environment will result in less than absolute numbers. What can you stream at > 866mbps?
- 4 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
yes I get that but but the theoretical speeds are 54 150 300 450 866 and I asume 1300 because of the specs. I am not talking about what you get in real life. I only saw on google a 1.5gbs connecton on a intel killer card.
- 4 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
so after more reading I guess it's in the channel wide, my intel can do 160 on two annetnnas and the ruckus can do 80.
Am I right ?
Intel
https://ark.intel.com/products/99446/Intel-Wireless-AC-9560
the r600
https://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/access-points/ruckus-indoor/ruckus-r600
Am I right ?
Intel
https://ark.intel.com/products/99446/Intel-Wireless-AC-9560
the r600
https://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/access-points/ruckus-indoor/ruckus-r600
- 4 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
so after more reading I guess it's in the channel wide, my intel can do 160 on two annetnnas and the ruckus can do 80.
Am I right ?
Intel
https://ark.intel.com/products/99446/Intel-Wireless-AC-9560
the r600
https://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/access-points/ruckus-indoor/ruckus-r600
like here is written
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac
Am I right ?
Intel
https://ark.intel.com/products/99446/Intel-Wireless-AC-9560
the r600
https://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/access-points/ruckus-indoor/ruckus-r600
like here is written
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac
Michael Brado, Official Rep
- 2864 Posts
- 399 Reply Likes
Yes, channel width is directly proportional to maximum throughput.
Phil Coverdale, Principal Technical Support Engineer
- 26 Posts
- 15 Reply Likes
1.3Gbps is achieved using 3x3:3 at 80MHz channel width.
That's transmitting on 3 antennae, receiving on 3 antennae with 3 parallel streams of data.
From reading the specification data sheet shared in the link above, it appears that this Intel card is capable of 2x2.
The same data rate can be achieved using 2 antennae, but only when using a channel width of 160MHz, which is not supported by the Ruckus R600.
That's transmitting on 3 antennae, receiving on 3 antennae with 3 parallel streams of data.
From reading the specification data sheet shared in the link above, it appears that this Intel card is capable of 2x2.
The same data rate can be achieved using 2 antennae, but only when using a channel width of 160MHz, which is not supported by the Ruckus R600.
(Edited)
Related Categories
-
Ruckus Unleashed
- 715 Conversations
- 370 Followers